Do we begin again to commend ourselves? or need we, as some others, epistles of commendation to you, or letters of commendation from you? Paul opens with a rhetorical question addressing accusations that he was self-promoting. The Greek synistaō (συνιστάω, "to commend" or "recommend") was used in the first-century world for formal letters of introduction carried by travelers—a common practice in Greco-Roman society where identity verification was crucial. False apostles infiltrating Corinth likely carried such credentials, while Paul's relationship with the Corinthians needed no external validation.
Paul's question is ironic: epistles of commendation to you would be absurd, since the Corinthians themselves were his living recommendation. The term epistolē (ἐπιστολή, "letter") echoes throughout verses 1-3, establishing the contrast between external written credentials and internal spiritual transformation. Paul's apostolic authority rested not on human endorsement but on the Spirit's work through his ministry—the converted Corinthians themselves were proof of his divine commission (1 Corinthians 9:2).
Historical Context
Letters of recommendation (epistolai systatikai) were essential in the ancient world for establishing credibility, especially for traveling teachers, philosophers, and merchants. Without modern identification systems, such letters from respected authorities authenticated one's identity and mission. The early church adopted this practice (Acts 18:27; Romans 16:1), but false teachers exploited it to gain entry into congregations. Paul wrote 2 Corinthians around 55-56 AD from Macedonia after a "painful visit" to Corinth, defending his ministry against opponents who questioned his apostolic credentials.
Questions for Reflection
Do you rely more on external credentials and human approval, or on the evidence of God's transforming work in your life?
How might Paul's rejection of self-commendation challenge our culture of personal branding and self-promotion?
In what ways are you a "living letter" that authenticates the gospel to those around you?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
Do we begin again to commend ourselves? or need we, as some others, epistles of commendation to you, or letters of commendation from you? Paul opens with a rhetorical question addressing accusations that he was self-promoting. The Greek synistaō (συνιστάω, "to commend" or "recommend") was used in the first-century world for formal letters of introduction carried by travelers—a common practice in Greco-Roman society where identity verification was crucial. False apostles infiltrating Corinth likely carried such credentials, while Paul's relationship with the Corinthians needed no external validation.
Paul's question is ironic: epistles of commendation to you would be absurd, since the Corinthians themselves were his living recommendation. The term epistolē (ἐπιστολή, "letter") echoes throughout verses 1-3, establishing the contrast between external written credentials and internal spiritual transformation. Paul's apostolic authority rested not on human endorsement but on the Spirit's work through his ministry—the converted Corinthians themselves were proof of his divine commission (1 Corinthians 9:2).